НАТУРАЛИЗАЦИЯ ЯЗЫКА: ЯЗЫКОВОЙ ПОТОК И ВЕРБАЛЬНЫЕ СТРУКТУРЫ
Автор:
Коули Стивен Дж.
Организация :
Хертфордшир (Великобритания)
Аннотация :
В статье процесс натурализации языка рассматривается на основе принципа ситуативно обусловленного ориентирующего взаимодействия.
Ключевые слова :
языковой поток, вербальные структуры, сжатая информация,
распределенные когнитивные системы, язык первого порядка, язык второго порядка
Список источников :
Baber, C. Smith, P., Cross, J., Hunter, J.,McMaster, R. 2006. Crime scene investigation as distributed cognition. Pragmatics and Cognition, 14/2: 357–385(29).
Barbieri, M. (Ed.) 2007. Introduction to Biosemiotics. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
Bechtel W. A. Abrahamsen, G. Graham 1998. The life of cognitive science. In: Bechtel W, Gra-
ham G (eds) A Companion to Cognitive Science. Blackwell, Malden, pp. 1–104.
Becker A. L. 1988. Language in Particular: A Lecture. In Tannen, D. (ed.), Linguistics in Context. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
Bottineau D. Language and enaction To appear. Enaction: Towards a New Paradigm for Cog-nitive Science. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne and
E. Di Paolo (eds.) Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Brooks R. 1999. Cambrian Intelligence: The Early History of the New AI. MIT Press: Cambridge MA.
Christiansen M. & Kirby S. 2003. Language Evolution. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Clark A. 1997. Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again. MIT Press: Cambridge MA.
Clark A. 2008. Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cowley S.J. 1994. The role of rhythm in conversations: a behavioural perspective. Language and Communication, 14, 353–376.
Cowley S.J. 2004. Contextualizing bodies: how human responsiveness constrains distributed cognition. Language Sciences, 26/6, 565–591.
Cowley S.J. 2007a. How human infants deal with symbol grounding. Interaction Studies, 8.1: 83–104.
Cowley S.J. 2007b. The Cradle of Language: making sense of bodily connections. To appear in
D. Moyal-Sharrock (ed.) Perspicuous Presentations: Essays on Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Psychology, Palgrave MacMillan, London, pp. 278–298.
Cowley S.J. 2008. Robots: the new linguistic informants? Connection Science, 20/4: 359–369.
Cowley S. J. In press. Language flow: opening the subject. To appear in Cognitive Semiotics.
Cowley S.J. & Spurrett, D. 2003. Putting apes, (body and language) together again. Language Sciences, 25: 289–318.
Craik K. 1943. The Nature of Explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deacon T. (1997). The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Human Brain. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
De Jaegher H. and Di Paolo, E. 2007. Participatory sense-making: an enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6: 485–507.
Dennett D. 1987. The Intentional Stance. MIT Press: Cambridge MA.
Dennett D. 1991. Real patterns, Journal of Philosophy, 88: 27–51.
Dunbar R. 1996. Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language. Harvard University Press: Cambridge,MA.
Elman J. L. 2004. “An alternative view of the mental lexicon”. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8: 301–308.
Fioratou E. and Cowley S.J. In press. Insightful thinking: Cognitive dynamics and material artifacts. To appear Pragmatics and Cognition.
Fodor J. 1975. The Language of Thought. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
Gibson J.J. 1950. The implications of learning theory for social psychology. In J.G. Miller (ed.) Experiments on Social process: A Symposium of Social psychology, McGraw Hill: New York, pp. 149–167.
Goodwin C. 2002. Time in action. Current Anthropology, 43 (Supplement August – October – Special issue Repertoires of Timekeeping in Anthropology: S19–S35).
Goldin-Meadow S. and Wagner S. 2005. How our hands help us learn, Trends in Cognitive Science, 9: 234–241
Gumperz J.J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Gumperz J.J. 2003. Response essay. In
S. Eerdmans, C. Prevignano, & P. Thibault, (eds.) Language and Interaction. John Benjamens: Amsterdam, pp. 105–126.
Harnad S. 2005. Distributed processes, distributed cognizers and collaborative cognition. Pragmatics and Cognition, 13(3): 501–514.
Harris R. 1981. The Language Myth. Duckworth: London.
Harris R. 1998. Introduction to Integrational Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon.
Hodges B. 2007. Good prospects: ecological and social perspectives on conforming, creating and caring in conversation. Language Sciences, 29/5: 584–604.
Holley A.J. 1993. Do brown hares signal to foxes? Ethology, 94: 21–30.
Hoffmeyer J. 2008. Biosemiotics. Scranton Press: London.
Hutchins E. 1995a. Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
Hutchins E. 1995b. How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science. 19, 265–288.
Järvilehto T. 1999. “The theory of the organism-environment system 1. Description of the theory”. Integrative Behavioural and Physiological Science, 33: 321–344.
Järvilehto T. Nurkkala, V.M and Koskela K. In press. The role of anticipation in reading. To appear, Pragmatics and Cognition.
Johnstone B. The Linguistic Individual: Self-Expression in Language and Linguistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 1996.
Kravchenko A. 2006. Cognitive linguistics,
biology of cognition and biosemiotics: bridging the gaps. Language Sciences, 28: 51–75.
Kravchenko A. 2007. Essential properties of language, or, why language is not a code. Language Sciences, 29/5: 650–671.
Kravchenko A. In press. The experiential basis of speech and writing as different cognitive domains. To appear, Pragmatics and Cognition.
Linell P. (2005). The Written Language Bias in Linguistics: Its Nature, Origins and Transformations. Routledge: London.
Linell P. 2009. Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Sense Making. Information Age Publi-shing: Charlotte, NC.
Lopes L. S. and Belpaeme T. 2008. Beyond the individual: new insights on language, cognition and robots. Connection Science, 20: 231–238.
Love N. 2004. Cognition and the language myth. Language Sciences, 26: 525–544.
Love N. 2007. Language and the digital code. Language Sciences, 29/5: 690–709.
Lyons C. Nehaniv C. and Canglosi A. (eds.) 2007. Emergence of Communication and Language. Springer verlag: London.
LyonP. 2006, “The biogenic approach to cognition,” Cognitive Processes, 7, 11–29.
Martin, J. and Davenport D. 1999. Noncomputational versus computational conceptions of reason: contrasting educational implications. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 19: 25–31.
Maturana H.R. 1978. Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In Miller, G. A. & Eli-zabeth L. (Eds.), Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought: Essays in Honor of Eric Lenneberg. Academic Press: New York, pp. 27–63.
Menary R. 2007. Writing as thinking. Language Sciences, 29; 621–633.
Menary R. 2008. Cognitive Integration: Mind and Cognition Unbounded. Palgrave MacMillan: London.
Moore T. & Carling A. 1982. Understanding Language. Macmillan: London.
Pattee H.H. 2001. «The physics of symbols: bridging the epistemic cut». Biosystems, 60, pp. 5–21.
Peirce C.S. 1998. Collected Papers, I–VIII, (ed. Hartshorne and Weiss; Burks) Thoemmes Press: London (1931–58).
Pinker S., Bloom P. 1990. Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,13, 707–784.
Port R. 2007. How are words stored in memory? Beyond phones and phonemes. New Ideas in Psychology, 25: 143–170.
Rączaszek J., Tuller B., Shapiro L.P., Case P., and Kelso S. 1999. Categorization of Ambiguous Sentences as a Function of a Changing Prosodic Parameter: A Dynamical Approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28/4: 367–393.
Rączaszek-Leonardi J. In press. Symbols as constraints: the structuring role of dynamics and self-organization in natural language To appear Pragma-tics and Cognition.
Raguso R. & Willis M. 2002. Synergy between visual and olfactory cues in nectar feeding by naïve hawkmoths Manduca Sexta. Animal Behavior, 64: 685–695.
Reddy M. 1979. The conduit metaphor: a case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.) Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, pp. 284–324.
Reed E. S. 1996. Encountering the World: toward and Ecological psychology. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Ross D. 2000. Rainforest realism: a Dennettian theory of existence. In D. Ross, A, Brook and
D. Thompson (Eds.) Dennett’s Philosophy: A Comprehensive Assessment. MIT Press: Cambridge MA, pp. 147–168.
Ross D. 2007. H. sapiens as ecologically special: what does language contribute? Language Sciences, 16/1: 710–731.
Searle J. R. 1980. «Minds, Brains and Programs», Behavioral and Brain Sciences.3: 417–424.
Steels L. and Belpaeme T. 2005. “Coordina-ting perceptually grounded categories through language: a case study for colour” Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 68, 469–489.
Spivey M. 2007. The Continuity of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spurrett D. & Cowley S.J. 2004. How to do things without words. Language Sciences, 26/5: 443–466.
Thelen E. and Smith L. 1993. A Dynamic Systems Approach to Develelopment. MIT Press: Cambridge MA.
Thibault P.J. 2004a. Brain, Mind and the Signifying Body: An Ecosocial and Semiotic Theory. Continuum: London.
Thibault P.J. 2004b. Agency and consciousness in discourse: self-other dynamics in a complex system. Continuum: London.
Thompson E. 2007. Mind in Life: Biology, phenomenology and the Sciences of Mind. Belknap, Harvard University Press; London.
Vygotsky L. 1986. Thought and Language. MIT Press: Cambridge MA.
Walmsley J. 2008. Methodological situatedness; or, DEEDS worth doing and pursuing. Cognitive Systems Research, 9, 150–159.
Wenger D. & Sparrow B. 2007. The Puzzle of Coaction. In: Distributed Cognition and the Will,
D. Ross, D. Spurrett, H. Kinkaid & L.G. Stephens (Eds.), pp. 17–41. MIT Press: Cambridge MA.
Willems R., Hagoort P. 2007. Neural evidence and the interplay between language, gesture and action: a review. Brain and Language, 101: 278–289.
Wilson E. 1998. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. Knopf: New York.
Wilson R. 2005. Genes and the Agents of Life.: the Individual in the Fragile Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein L.W. 1958. Philosophical Investigations. (2nd Ed.). Blackwell, Oxford.
Wittgenstein L.W. 1980. On Certainty. Blackwell, Oxford.
Ziemke T. 1999. Rethinking Grounding. In
A. Riegler, and M. Peschl, (Eds.) Does Representation need Reality?, pp. 87–94, Proceedings of ’New Trends in Cognitive Science-Perspectives from Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, Epistemology, and Artificial Life.’
Страницы:
5-21
