СИНТАКСИЧЕСКИЙ РАЗБОР СОСТАВЛЯЮЩИХ ФРАЗЫ В ASD-STE100 С ARTEMIS

СИНТАКСИЧЕСКИЙ РАЗБОР СОСТАВЛЯЮЩИХ ФРАЗЫ В ASD-STE100 С ARTEMIS

Автор:  Ф.Х. Кортес-Родригес¹, К. Родригес-Хуарес²

Организация :  ¹Университет Ла-Лагуны, ²Университет Лас-Пальмас-де-Гран-Канария

Аннотация :  Данная работа сделана в рамках направления понимания естественного языка (ПЕЯ)
с использованием устройства синтаксического анализа ARTEMIS, которое является прототипом ПЕЯ и состоит из трех суб-модулей: программа-конструктор (CLS) и программа-компоновщик (the COREL Scheme Builder) предоставляют семантические структуры, выделяя языковые фрагменты, программа развития грамматического окружения the Grammar Development Environment (GDE) занимается морфо-синтаксической компоновкой предложений. В ходе разработок были спроектированы правила порождения и условно-чистая матрица внутри GDE для анализа фразового компонента управляемого языка, ASD-STE100, а именно, упрощенного технического английского. Это полезно как для системы ARTEMIS, повышающей достоверность результатов, так и для пользователей ASD-STE100, т.к. программа становится более адаптированной к их нуждам.

Ключевые слова :  ARTEMIS, правила синтаксического анализа понимания естественного языка,
упрощенный технический английский язык.

Список источников :  ASD-STE Simplified Technical English. (2017). Specification ASD-STE 100. TM: International specification for the preparation of technical documentation in a controlled language. Issue 7. January 2017. Brussels: ASD.
Barrès, V. & Lee, J. (2014). Template construction grammar: from visual scene description to language comprehension and agrammatism. Neuroinformatics, 12(1), 181-208.
Bergen, B. & Chang, N. (2005). Embodied construction grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In J. Östman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions, number 3 in Constructional Approaches to Language (pp. 147-190). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Cortés-Rodríguez, F. (2016a). Towards the computational implementation of RRG. Círculo de lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 65, 75-108.
Cortés-Rodríguez, F.  (2016b). Parsing simple clauses within ARTEMIS: The computational treatment of the layered structure of the clause in Role and Reference Grammar. 34th International Conference of AESLA. Alicante, 14-16, April 2016.
Cortés-Rodríguez, F. & Mairal-Usón, R. (2016). Building an RRG computational grammar. Onomázein, 34, 86-117.
Díaz Galán, A. & Fumero Pérez, M. C. (2017). ARTEMIS: State of the art and future horizons. In
C. Rodríguez-Juárez (Ed.), Special Issue: New Insights into Meaning Construction and Knowledge Representation, Revista de Lengua para Fines Específicos, 23(2), 16-40.
Fumero Pérez, M. C. & Díaz Galán, A. (2017). The Interaction of parsing rules and argument- predicate constructions: implications for the structure of the Grammaticon in FunGramKB. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 12, 33-44.
FunGramKB. Functional Grammar Knowledge Base. URL: www.fungramkb.com.
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kay, P. & Fillmore, J. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The ‘What’s X doing Y?’ construction. Language, 75, 1-33.
Kuhn, T. (2014). A survey and classification of controlled natural languages. Computational Linguistics, 40(1), 121-170.
Mairal-Usón, R. & Periñán-Pascual, C. (2009). The anatomy of the lexicon component within the framework of a conceptual knowledge base. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 22, 217-244.
Mairal-Usón, R. & Periñán-Pascual, C. (2016). Representing constructional schemata in the FunGramKB Grammaticon. In J. Fleischhauer, A. Latrouite & R. Osswald (Eds.), Explorations of the syntax-semantics interface (pp. 77-108). Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.
Mairal-Usón, R. & Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. (2009) Levels of description and explanation in meaning construction. In C. Butler & J. Martín Arista (Eds.), Deconstructing Constructions (pp. 135-198). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Marques, T. & Beuls, K. (2016). Evaluation strategies for computational construction grammars. Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1137-1146.
Martín Díaz, M. A. (2017) An account of English yes/no interrogative sentences within ARTEMIS. In C. Rodríguez-Juárez (Ed.), Special Issue: New Insights into Meaning Construction and Knowledge Representation, Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, 23(2), 41-62.
Periñán-Pascual, C. (2013). Towards a model of constructional meaning for natural language understanding. In B. Nolan & E. Diedrichsen (Eds.), Linking constructions into Functional Linguistics: The role of constructions in RRG grammars (Studies in Language Series) (pp. 205-230). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Periñán-Pascual, C. & Arcas-Túnez, F. (2007). Cognitive modules of an NLP knowledge base for language understanding. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 39, 197-204.
Periñán-Pascual, C. & Arcas-Túnez, F. (2010). Ontological commitments in FunGramKB. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 44, 27-34.
Periñán-Pascual, C. & Arcas-Túnez, F. (2014). The implementation of the CLS constructor in ARTEMIS. In B. Nolan & C. Periñán-Pascual (Eds.), Language processing and grammars. The role of


functionally oriented computational models (pp. 165-196) Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Periñán-Pascual, C. & Mairal-Usón, R. (2009). Bringing Role and Reference Grammar to natural language understanding. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 43, 265-273.
Periñán-Pascual, C. & Mairal-Usón, R. (2011). The COHERENT Methodology in FunGramKB. Onomázein, 24, 13-33.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. (2013). Meaning construction, meaning interpretation and formal expression in the Lexical Constructional Model. In
B. Nolan & E. Diedrichsen (Eds.), Linking constructions into functional linguistics: The role of constructions in grammar (pp. 231-270). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. & Galera Masegosa, A. (2014). Cognitive modeling. A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. & Mairal-Usón, R. (2008). Levels of description and constraining factors in meaning construction: An introduction to the Lexical Constructional Model. Folia Lingüística, 42 (2), 355-400.
Steels, L. (2004). Constructivist development of grounded construction grammars. In W. Daelemans (Ed.), Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
(pp. 9-19). Barcelona. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Steels, L. (Ed.). (2011). Design patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar. In Constructional Approaches to Language, 11. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Steels, L. & de Beule, J. (2006). A (very) brief introduction to fluid construction grammar. Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Scalable Natural Language Understanding (pp. 73-80). Association for Computational Linguistics. New York City.
Trott, S, Appriou, A., Feldman, J. & Janin, A. (2015). Natural language understanding and communication for multi-agent systems. In Artificial Intelligence for Human-Robot Interaction Papers from the AAAI Fall Symposium, (pp. 137-141).
Van Valin, R. D. (2005). Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Valin, R. D. (2008). RPs and the nature of lexical and syntactic categories in Role and Reference Grammar. In R. D. Van Valin Jr. (Ed.), Investigations of the Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface (pp. 161-178). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Van Valin, R. D. & LaPolla, R. (1997). Syntax. Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Страницы:  97-109